General characteristics of the Armenian alphabet
Armenian is written in its own alphabet, which was created by St. Mesrop Mashtots in 405/406 CE with the help of Catholicos Sahak Partev and King Vramshapuh. The primary concern for the invention of an alphabet was to make the Holy Scriptures and liturgy intelligible to the faithful.
The Armenian alphabet originally consisted of 36 original letters. They have also numerical values. To these letters, Օ օ [ō] and Ֆ ֆ [f] were added at a later stage, probably in the 12th century. A 39th letter also exists, և, but this is rather a ligature: ե + ւ (e + w) = և․
The Greek alphabet is the prototype of early Christian written systems. In the case of the Armenian alphabet, the Greek source is displayed in the order of letters, whereas the shapes of letters are different with the exception of some of them. The formal affiliations of the Armenian letters are debated.
Primary sources from the 5th century about the origin of the Armenian alphabet and its inventor Mesrop Mashtots include Koriwn [Koryun] (disciple and biographer of Mesrop Mashtots), Movses Khorenatsi, and Łazar Parpetsi.
Presented in Table 1 are:
● the Armenian letters (majuscule and minuscule),
● their transcriptions according to the HMB (Hübschmann-Meillet-Benveniste) system,
● their numerical values,
● and the corresponding letters in the Greek alphabet.
Table 1: Classical Armenian alphabet
Table 2 shows the Modern Armenian alphabet with transliteration and phonetic values of the letters.
Mesrop Mashtots (the inventor of the Armenian alphabet) and his name
Mesrop Mashtots, the son of Vardan, was born in ca. 362 CE in the Hatsekats village in the district of Taron. Died in 440 CE at Vagharshapat he was buried at a chapel in Oshakan, a historical village not far from the town of Ashtarak.
Various attempts have been made to etymologize the name Mashtots (variant readings include Maštʻocʻ, Mašdocʻ). It may contain a personal name comparable to Parthian Māšt [m’št-], Middle Persian Maštag [mštky], Maštagāy [mštk’y], names of unclear origin. On the other hand, note Old Iranian *Masišta- ‘greatest’ reflected in such personal names as Babylonian Ma-si-iš-tu and Greek Μασίστης, as well as Middle Persian Masd-ōš, Northpontic Iranian Μαστας, Μαστους, etc. The suffix -ocʻ is frequent in Armenian names, whether native or borrowed. Note especially Tirocʻ beside Tiros probably from Middle Persian Tīrōs.
The names of the Armenian letters
The names of Armenian letters can be seen in Table 3.
Table 3: Names of the Armenian letters
The Armenian word for ‘alphabet’, namely այբուբեն (aybuben), is the composition of the first two names of the letters that begin the alphabet ayb and ben and the conjunction u ‘and’.
The two-thirds of the letter names may be grouped according to their structural patterns:
da, za, ca, ja, ša, č‘a, ṙa;
ē, žē, xē, čē, pē, ǰē, sē, rē, k‘ē;
t‘o, ho, o, c‘o;
bēn, kēn, mēn;
liwn, tiwn, hiwn.
The names of certain letters, such as ayb, gim, nu, o, pē, and vew, are reminiscent of the names of corresponding letters in Greek and/or Semitic alphabets.
Some authors proposed arbitrary etymologies for certain letter names. For example, ayb ‘the letter a’ has been linked with the Armenian word ayg ‘dawn’ on the one hand, and arp‘/arp‘i ‘ether, upper regions of the sky; sun’ and arew/g ‘sun’ on the other. Needless to say these comparisons severely violate the phonological rules and involve arbitrary semantical interpretations and are thus totally unacceptable.
The types of the Armenian script
Modern paleographers recognize four major types of Armenian script.
The earliest uncial script is called երկաթագիր (erkat‘agir), literally ‘iron letters / script’, with large, bold, rounded majuscules that are observed in the earliest surviving manuscripts, old lapidary inscriptions, early graffitis in Sinai desert by Armenian pilgrims, as well as inscriptions in the Jerusalem mosaics. Of this uncial script, two main types exist: upright and slanted.
Then there is բոլորգիր (bolorgir), literally ‘rounded script’ or ‘complete script’, which is a smaller script with both majuscules and minuscules, and an even smaller, more cursive script that is called նօտրգիր (nōtrgir), literary ‘notary script’. There is also a mixed uncial-minuscule (erkat‘agir and bolorgir) type.
The last major type is a fluid cursive with joined letters called շղագիր (šɫagir), literally ‘slanted script’.
According to the writing direction, languages may be divided into four types:
a) from left to right;
b) from right to left;
c) from left to right and right to left alternately, boustrophedon (from Greek adv. βουστροφηδόν literally meaning ‘turning like oxen in ploughing’);
d) vertical, from top to bottom.
Like most of the scripts known to us, the Armenian one is written from left to right and thus belongs to the first type.
The first sentence that has been written in Armenian letters
The first sentence written in Armenian by Mesrop Maštoc‘ after he created the Armenian alphabet is the famous phrase from Proverbs of Solomon 1.2-3:
Ճանաչել զիմաստութիւն եւ զխրատ, իմանալ զբանս հանճարոյ / Čanač‘el zimastut‘iwn ew zxrat, imanal zbans hančaroy.
It renders the following Greek passage: γνῶναι σοφίαν καὶ παιδείαν νοῆσαί τε λόγους φρονήσεως “To know wisdom and instruction, and to perceive words of understanding”.
The problem of pre-Mashtotsian writing
The existence of an Armenian writing system and literature before Mesrop Mashtots has long been a matter of intense debate. At this stage of research, we have no concrete evidence. It is more than probable, however, that the pre-Christian Armenians used some signs for ritual or magical purposes. Connected to this, scholars quote a remarkable passage from "Meknutyun araratsots" attributed to Yeghishe, in which one finds among activities that are considered as unacceptable for Christians “to draw written signs with alien thoughts” (awtar xorhrdovk‘ nšanagirs gcel).
Some ethnographic materials indirectly testify that prehistoric Armenians might have used birch bark for writing magic signs. In the Armenian district of Basen, according to G. Hakobyan (1974: 264), “they made amulets (hmayil) out of birch bark, put them into a triangular cloth, sewed and hung from the neck of beautiful children and animals to keep them away from the Evil Eye”. It is not specified whether there were written signs on these birch bark amulets. Nevertheless, there is some indirect evidence from Sasun, Hamshen, Xarberd, Van, Syunik, and Gharadagh which makes one believe that those triangular amulets, at least originally, contained magical writings.
This practice of writing magic signs on birch bark finds parallels, either genetic or typological, in other Indo-European traditions, namely Indic and Slavic. The bark of Skt. bhūrjá-- ‘a kind of birch’ was used to make writing material (attested in the Yajurveda). A similar practice is found in East Slavic: Russ. dial. beresto displays the meanings ‘birch bark’, ‘letter’, and ‘paper’ and is derived from the same PIE word for ‘birch’, *bh(e)rHĝ-.
Pseudoscientific theories about the origin of the Armenian alphabet
The Armenian alphabet became the subject of various pseudoscientific theories. Some of them ascribe divine meanings to certain letters in relation with their order in the alphabet. For example, the third and seventh letters, Գ [g] and Է [ē], are taken as representing the name of Grigor Lusavorich (Illuminator) and the word ē ‘existence, being; Supreme Being’, respectively, and this is treated in relation with the divine numbers ‘3’ and ‘7’. In fact, the place of Գ [g] and Է [ē] in the alphabet is merely conditioned by the fact that they correspond to the third (γ / g) and seventh (η / ē) letters of the Greek alphabet, so the aforementioned interpretations are totally baseless.
There is a weird theory according to which the Armenian metal designations reflect their atomic numbers in Mendeleev’s periodic table of elements. For example, the Armenian word ոսկի (oski) is composed of o, s, k, and i, which are the 24th, 29th, 15th and 11th letters of the alphabet respectively, and the sum of their numbers, 24 + 29 + 15 + 11 = 79, reflects the atomic number of ‘gold’, that is 79. This “theory” is unacceptable for the following reasons:
The idea boldly contradicts the notion and methodology of comparative-historical linguistics; most of the Armenian metal designations have clearly established (either native or borrowed) origins, which cannot be reconciled with the aforementioned fancy idea.
The correspondence with atomic numbers works only in one or two cases. In order to adjust the remaining designations to the Procrustean bed of their “theory”, the authors had to undertake various manipulations violating the elementary sound laws or assuming non-existent wordforms. For example, the Middle Armenian word klaye(a)k, which is clearly a young loanword from Arabic, has been forcefully made †kalay, and erkat‘ ‘iron’ was mysteriously changed to †ang.
For other pseudoscientific theories on the Armenian alphabet, see the paragraph entitled “The names of the letters”.
31.05.2020, Leiden / Los Angeles